Calculating Thromboembolic Risk (For Anticoagulation in AF)
ASSESS NEED FOR ANTICOAGULATION
Recommend using European Society Guidelines For Management of Atrial Fibrillation to establish thomboembolic and bleeding risks in making decisions regarding anticoagulation. These are summarised as follows:
Thromboembolic risk:
Use of CHA2DS2-VASc Score to assess risk allocating points as follows:
RISK FACTOR |
SCORE* |
---|---|
Congestive heart failure/EF </= 40% |
1 |
Hypertension |
1 |
Age =/> 75 years |
2 |
Diabetes Mellitus |
1 |
Stroke/TIA/thromboembolism |
2 |
Vascular disease (MI, peripheral artery disease, aortic plaque) |
1 |
Age 65-74 |
1 |
Sex category ( i.e female) |
1 |
MAXIMUM |
9 |
Adjusted stroke rate per year according ESC*
CHA2DS2VASc Score |
Adjusted stroke rate (%/year) |
---|---|
0 |
0.78 |
1 |
2.01 |
2 |
3.71 |
3 |
5.92 |
4 |
9.27 |
5 |
15.26 |
6 |
19.74 |
7 |
21.5 |
8 |
22.38 |
In the absence of contraindication :
CHA2DS2VASc Score |
Recommeded antithrombotic therapy |
---|---|
>/=2 |
Oral anticoagulant (OAC)* |
1 |
Either aspirin or OAC* Preferred: OAC* |
0 |
Either no antithrombotic therapy or aspirin Preferred: no antithrombotic therapy |
*OAC= Warfarin or new oral anticoagulant; dabigatran/rivaroxaban can be considered as per Peninsula Prescribing Group recommendations.
Decisions regarding thromboprophylaxis will obviously need to take into account the patient’s individual risk of bleeding complications.
The HAS-BLED Scoring system below can be used to identify/reduce ongoing bleeding risks.
Those with score=/> 3 require more careful supervision/ monitoring
RISK FACTOR |
SCORE |
Hypertension (systolic BP>160mmHg) |
1 |
Abnormal liver/renal function (chirrosis or bilirubin 2xULN, other LFTsx3 ULN/ Creatinine >200umol/L |
|
Stroke |
1 |
Bleeding (previous bleeding or tendency to eg. diathesis) |
1 |
Labile INRs (high/unstable or <60% in therapeutic range) |
1 |
Elderly (age>65years) |
1 |
Drugs or alcohol (concomitant use of antiplatelets/NSAIDs etc) |
1 point each = max 2 |
MAXIMUM |
9 |
Risk of falls has not been included but can be taken into consideration. Bear in mind that there is some evidence to suggest that to exceed benefits from anticoagulation patients at high risk of thromboembolic complications would have to be falling many times per year.
Antiplatelets are a poor substitute for OAC in reducing risk of stroke in AF and should only be considered if there are specific contraindictions to OAC or the patient refuses OAC.
Aspirin / Clopidogrel combination may be the most efficacious but the bleeding risk for this and even aspirin monotherapy in high risk patients eg the elderly, should be considered to be similar to the use of OAC.
Concomitant use of Oral anticoagulants and antiplatelets is not generally recommended without advice from specialist.
The GP is usually best placed to make a decision regarding anticoagulation, given better knowledge of the patient’s individual circumstances, past history and medications.
Patients should be involved in the discussion regarding choice of anticoagulation
Remember to reassess thromboprohylaxis requirements if relevant medical conditions develop or patient reaches 65/75 years.
Further Information
Date reviewed 05/07/2021
Next review due 05/07/2022
Sifter name Elizabeth Fell / Bridgitte Wesson
Contributors Dr Louise Melley – Assistant Specialist Cardiology RCHT